Randy Zurcher: Candidate For Congress District 1
Randy Zurcher, Candidate For Congress District 1
Election Date: May 19, 2026
Candidate Website: Randy4Georgia.com
Candidate Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/randy4georgia
Candidate Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/randyzurcher
See your sample ballot and all candidates for this and every election here: https://mvp.sos.ga.gov/s/
Question 1 Topic: Defending Constitutional Rights
Over the past year, federal officers within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have detained individuals without cause and searched homes without a judicial warrant, which violates the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
Will you support the Fourth Amendment right to privacy and demand an end to unlawful conduct by DHS and other government agencies?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: No government should be able to monitor, detain, or search people without proper warrants and due process. I will push for stronger oversight, transparency, and enforcement of constitutional protections, including limits on data collection and use. National security cannot be used as an excuse to violate basic rights. We can keep people safe while still respecting civil liberties, and I will fight to ensure our laws and agencies reflect that balance.
Question 2 Topic: Defending Constitutional Rights
Public reports estimate that since 2022, President Donald Trump has issued more than 100 threats to investigate, prosecute, imprison, or otherwise punish those who are critical of him, including news organizations and talk show hosts (such as Jimmy Kimmel). In September 2025, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi indicted former FBI director James Comey after Trump publicly called for his prosecution.
Do you agree that the president and other government officials should not attack political enemies or those exercising their First Amendment rights?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: That kind of behavior undermines democracy and chills free speech. In this country, people have the right to speak, organize, protest, and criticize those in power without fear of retaliation. I will support strong oversight, clear ethical standards, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure government authority is never used to punish dissent. Leadership should be accountable to the people, not weaponized against them.
Question 3 Topic: Defending Constitutional Rights
Videos, court statements, and internal communications show that officers of the Department of Homeland Security, including ICE agents, have knowingly and criminally acted outside of their authority. Since the killing of Renee Good by an ICE agent, the administration has prevented the state of Minnesota from conducting a proper criminal investigation of the perpetrator.
Do you agree that, subject to existing legal precedent, states have the right to prosecute crimes, and will you advocate for the investigation and prosecution of crimes committed by federal officers?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: No one should be above the law, including federal officers. If credible evidence shows that a federal official has committed a crime, it should be investigated and, where appropriate, prosecuted through proper legal channels. I will support strong oversight, independent investigations, and clear accountability standards so abuses of power are addressed while respecting due process and the balance between state and federal authority.
Question 4 Topic: Commitment To Democratic Process
A landmark 2004 Princeton study found that a small group of elites and
corporations have the greatest influence on U.S. legislation. This issue was
exacerbated in 2010, when SCOTUS’s Citizens United decision paved the way
for the creation of SuperPACs, which to date have spent more than $5 billion in
anonymous special interest dollars to influence US elections and policy.
In your role, will you work to ensure that corporations and PACs are not able
to exert undue influence on the legislative process?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: Corporations and PACs should not be able to buy influence over our laws. I do not take corporate PAC money, and I will fight to pass campaign finance reforms that reduce the role of big money in politics. That includes stronger disclosure requirements, limits on dark money, and public financing options so working people can run and win without relying on wealthy donors. I also support tougher ethics rules and closing loopholes that allow special interests to dominate the legislative process. Our government should answer to voters, not corporations.
Question 5 Topic: Commitment To Democratic Process
The Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank that authored Project
2025, has catalogued every instance of voter fraud in federal elections since
1982 and found that it occurred exceedingly rarely—about once for every
million votes. Still, unfounded claims of fraud are frequently used to cast doubt
on election results and to advocate for more restrictive laws. President Trump
has even called for Republicans to “nationalize” the elections, and on March 31,
2026, he signed an executive order to restrict absentee ballots.
As an elected official, will you help protect free and fair elections, and refute
unfounded claims of fraud that undermine faith in our electoral process?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: Our democracy depends on confidence in the process, and that means both securing our elections and telling the truth about how they function. I support paper ballots, audits, and strong cybersecurity to ensure integrity, alongside expanded access like early voting and vote-by-mail. When misinformation spreads, leaders have a responsibility to correct it, not exploit it. We can protect election security while defending every eligible voter’s right to participate.
Question 6 Topic: Commitment To Democratic Process
Though congressional district maps are usually only redrawn once a decade after the census, several states, including Texas and California, passed new laws in 2025 with the explicitly partisan purpose of gerrymandering to gain more seats in the House of Representatives. In Wisconsin and Illinois, gerrymandering has resulted in the winning party receiving about 25% more House seats than their vote share.
Do you agree that fair representation requires fair maps, and will you advocate for them?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: When politicians draw districts to protect themselves, it weakens democracy and silences communities. I will advocate for independent redistricting processes that prioritize transparency, community input, and compliance with the Voting Rights Act. Maps should reflect real communities, not partisan advantage. I will also support federal standards to prevent extreme gerrymandering and protect minority representation. Voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.
Question 7 Topic: Belief In System of Law
In the case of J.G.G. v. Trump, the administration disobeyed a federal court’s
explicit order on March 15, 2025, to stop a deportation flight of Venezualan
immigrants and to return any flights that were already in the air. The following
year, on February 26, 2026, Federal Court Judge Patrick Schiltz issued an
opinion detailing the Trump administration’s failure to comply with hundreds
of court orders pertaining to Habeas petitions.
In your position, will you follow court orders and hold other officials
accountable for failing to do so?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: Respect for the rule of law requires that elected officials follow court orders, even when they disagree with them. Ignoring lawful rulings undermines our constitutional system and sets a dangerous precedent. In Congress, I will support strong oversight and accountability measures to ensure compliance with court decisions at all levels of government. When officials refuse to follow the law, there must be consequences. Upholding the separation of powers and maintaining public trust means making sure no one is above the law.
Question 8 Topic: Belief In System of Law
Donald Trump has personally profited an estimated $1.2 billion from cryptocurrency in the second term of his presidency while simultaneously acting to deregulate the industry.
Do you believe that a president and other government officials should be required to divest from conflicts of interest during their term in office, and will you commit to doing the same?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: Public officials should not be in a position to profit from the offices they hold. Presidents and other elected leaders should be required to divest from financial interests that create conflicts, or place assets in truly blind trusts, so their decisions are made in the public interest. I support stronger ethics laws, full financial transparency, and enforcement with real consequences. I will follow those standards myself by avoiding conflicts and disclosing my finances, because trust in government depends on knowing decisions aren’t driven by personal gain.
Question 9 Topic: Countering Authoritarianism
On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down $175 billion of tariffs instituted by President Trump, determining that imposing these tariffs overstepped the bounds of his authority. The administration has also illegally withheld congressionally-appropriated funds from states and government agencies through executive action, per the Government Accountability Office.
Will you commit to supporting Congress’s power of the purse and demand an end to this form of executive overreach?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: Congress’s power of the purse is a core constitutional responsibility, and it must be respected. No president should be able to unilaterally redirect or withhold funds that Congress has lawfully appropriated. That undermines the separation of powers and the will of the people. I will oppose executive overreach in budget decisions and support strong oversight to ensure funds are spent as intended. If necessary, I will back legislation and legal action to reinforce Congress’s authority and restore accountability in how taxpayer dollars are used.
Question 10 Topic: Countering Authoritarianism
In 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that the president is immune from criminal liability for “official acts,” making impeachment the only reliable check on presidential power.
Do you believe that Congress has the responsibility to conduct impeachment proceedings, as it did by investigating alleged corruption by President Biden, in order to prevent corruption, abuse of power, and unconstitutional acts for which the president is otherwise unaccountable?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: A lawless president must be held to account.
Question 11 Topic: Countering Authoritarianism
During his second term in office, Donald Trump has fired seventeen independent inspectors general and defunded or removed key staff from independent government watchdogs including the Office of Professional Responsibility, the Office of Government Ethics, and the Office of Special Counsel. The administration has also failed to keep adequate records, blocked the release of records (such as the Epstein Files), and claimed ownership of presidential records in violation of legal precedent and ethical standards.
In your role, will you work to ensure transparency and accountability through adequate record keeping and independent inspectors, and will you hold those who do not meet these standards accountable?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: We must have accountability, even if it is politically messy.
Question 12 Topic: Truth in Public Discourse and Decision-Making
Despite overwhelming scientific consensus on the benefits and risks of vaccines, some high-profile critics continue to make claims about vaccines that have been debunked. Do you believe that RFK Jr.’s choice to staff the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices with people who push easily-refuted pseudoscientific theories is harmful to Americans’ health, and will you advocate for science-based decision-making?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: We need experts, not political sycophants whose only qualification is loyalty to a despot.
Question 13 Topic: Truth in Public Discourse and Decision-Making
Many public officials make false assertions when they believe it is politically useful. Vice President J.D. Vance defended this practice after claiming Haitians were eating cats and dogs, saying “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do.”
Do you agree that lying about the facts voters use to make decisions distracts from the actual issues, and will you commit to accurately representing established facts?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: We must have elected officials and candidates who will consistently tell the truth.